
Challenger banks and FinTech firms are maintaining a competitive edge over traditional financial institutions, as differences in organisational structure, culture and product development approaches continue to shape the pace of innovation across the sector.
Despite significant investment in digital transformation, many incumbent banks are still struggling to match FinTechs in areas such as onboarding, transparent pricing and mobile-first service delivery. While user interfaces have improved, deeper structural inefficiencies often remain unresolved, limiting the overall impact on customer experience.
A key differentiator lies in how FinTech firms are built. Unlike traditional institutions, which have evolved over decades with layered systems and processes, FinTech companies are typically designed to solve specific customer pain points. This focus enables them to iterate quickly and refine products in response to user feedback, creating a more agile and customer-centric development cycle.
Laurent Descout, CEO and co-founder of Neo, highlighted that this cultural foundation plays a central role in shaping FinTech competitiveness. “Challenger banks continue to put growing pressure on traditional institutions, particularly in areas such as onboarding, transparent pricing and mobile-first services,” he said, adding that FinTechs often retain an advantage in speed of innovation and customer-focused product design.
In contrast, legacy banks face structural constraints that can slow innovation. Large institutions must operate within complex governance frameworks, balancing regulatory compliance, risk management and internal coordination across multiple business units. While these systems are critical for stability, they can hinder rapid decision-making and product rollout.
“Legacy banks can innovate, but matching the speed and agility of FinTech startups is difficult,” Descout noted, pointing to organisational complexity rather than regulation as the primary barrier. FinTech firms, he added, tend to operate with leaner teams and more flexible technology systems, allowing them to respond more quickly to changing market conditions and customer expectations.
Attempts by banks to replicate FinTech-style innovation internally have produced mixed outcomes. Several institutions have launched standalone digital brands or innovation units, but sustaining startup-like agility within a large organisation has proven challenging. The closure of HSBC’s digital proposition Zing underscores the difficulty of balancing compliance requirements, internal priorities and speed of execution.
Descout observed that building FinTech-style products within traditional banking structures often requires navigating lengthy decision-making processes and entrenched operational models. As a result, simply launching a new digital brand is unlikely to be sufficient.
The broader industry takeaway is that competition is no longer defined solely by digital capability, but by how effectively organisations align technology, culture and operating models. For incumbent banks, narrowing the gap with FinTechs will likely require more fundamental changes to how products are developed, how teams are structured and how quickly institutions can respond to evolving customer needs.

